Tag Archive | "wapo"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

WaPo/ABC Uses Skewed Poll Data and Fuzzy Questions to Sway Results in Bami’s Favor

Posted on 20 October 2009 by Mr. Harrington

This seems to be a trending topic among the State Run Media…  Remember when CNN used skewed poll numbers?

Well, in the latest WaPo/ABC poll, 33% of those polled were Democrats, and only 20% were Republicans…

           Democrat  Republican  Independent
10/18/09      33         20           42

And here is the fuzzy question in question…

8. Would you support or oppose having the government create a new health insurance

plan to compete with private health insurance plans?

           Support      Oppose
10/18/09   57           40

The only problem with that question is that private insurance can’t compete with the government.  It isn’t possible.  It is fundamentally not possible.

The government does not need to make a profit.  They don’t have overhead, they don’t have to meet a budget.  They have the power to tax.  Private insurance does not have that power.

Oh well…I guess the Liberal Media can continue to be the lap dogs of the Government as opposed to the guard dogs for the people.

Read–Hot Air

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , ,

Washington Post Issues Correction Over Racist Undertones…

Posted on 22 September 2009 by Mr. Harrington

Folks, in the original article, the Washington Post suggested that the duo who recorded the ACORN tapes were motivated by racism.

The correction states,

“This article about the community organizing group ACORN incorrectly said that a conservative journalist targeted the organization for hidden-camera videos partly because its voter-registration drives bring Latinos and African Americans to the polls. Although ACORN registers people mostly from those groups, the maker of the videos, James E. O’Keefe, did not specifically mention them.”

I am sick and tired of being called a racist. There are a lot of Americans with a lot of anger brewing…This kind of crap better stop, or bad things will begin to happen…

Read–Washington Post

Comments (1)

Advertise Here
Advertise Here